{“lastseen”:”2026-02-04T14:05:42″,”description”:”Journalists decided to test whether the Grok chatbot still generates non\u2011consensual sexualized images, even after xAI, Elon Musk\u2019s artificial intelligence company, and X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, promised tighter safeguards.\\n\\nUnsurprisingly, it does. \\n\\nAfter scrutiny from regulators all over the world\u2014triggered by reports that Grok could generate sexualized images of minors\u2014xAI framed it as an \\”isolated\\” lapse and said it was urgently fixing \\”lapses in safeguards.\\”\\n\\nA Reuters retest suggests the core abuse pattern remains. Reuters had nine reporters run dozens of controlled prompts through Grok after X announced new limits on sexualized content and image editing. In the first round, Grok produced sexualized imagery in response to 45 of 55 prompts. In 31 of those 45, the reporters explicitly said the subject was vulnerable or would be humiliated by the pictures.\\n\\nA second round, five days later, still yielded sexualized images in 29 of 43 prompts, even when reporters said the subjects had not consented. \\n\\nCompeting systems from OpenAI, Google, and Meta refused identical prompts and instead warned users against generating non\u2011consensual content.\\n\\nThe prompts were deliberately framed as real\u2011world abuse scenarios. Reporters told Grok the photos were of friends, co-workers, or strangers who were body\u2011conscious, timid, or survivors of abuse, and that they had not agreed to editing. Despite that, Grok often complied\u2014for example, turning a \u201cfriend\u201d into a woman in a revealing purple two\u2011piece or putting a male acquaintance into a small gray bikini, oiled up and posed suggestively. In only seven cases did Grok explicitly reject requests as inappropriate; in others it failed silently, returning generic errors or generating different people instead.\\n\\nThe result is a system illustrating the same lesson its creators say they’re trying to learn: if you ship powerful visual models without exhaustive abuse testing and robust guardrails, people will use them to sexualize and humiliate others, including children. Grok\u2019s record so far suggests that lesson still hasn’t sunk in.\\n\\nGrok limited AI image editing to paid users after the backlash. But paywalling image tools\u2014and adding new curbs\u2014looks more like damage control than a fundamental safety reset. Grok still accepts prompts that describe non\u2011consensual use, still sexualizes vulnerable subjects, and still behaves more permissively than rival systems when asked to generate abusive imagery. For victims, the distinction between \u201cpublic\u201d and private generations is meaningless if their photos can be weaponized in DMs or closed groups at scale.\\n\\n## Sharing images\\n\\nIf you’ve ever wondered why some parents post images of their children with a smiley emoji across their face, this is part of the reason.\\n\\nDon\u2019t make it easy for strangers to copy, reuse, or manipulate your photos.\\n\\nThis is another compelling reason to reduce your digital footprint. Think carefully before posting photos of yourself, your children, or other sensitive information on public social media accounts.\\n\\nAnd treat everything you see online\u2014images, voices, text\u2014as potentially AI-generated unless they can be independently verified. They\u2019re not only used to sway opinions, but also to solicit money, extract personal information, or create abusive material.\\n\\n* * *\\n\\n**We don ‘t just report on threats – we help protect your social media**\\n\\nCybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your social media accounts by using Malwarebytes Identity Theft Protection.”,”published”:”2026-02-04T13:50:15″,”modified”:”2026-02-04T13:50:15″,”type”:”malwarebytes”,”title”:”Grok continues producing sexualized images after promised fixes”,”source”:””,”references”:””,”id”:”MALWAREBYTES:DBF968F4DCFD5F2E7BE9BFE644165818″,”bulletinFamily”:”blog”,”cwe”:null,”cvelist”:[],”sourceData”:””,”sourceHref”:””,”cvss”:{“score”:0,”severity”:”NONE”,”vector”:”NONE”,”version”:”NONE”},”cvss2″:{},”cvss3″:{“version”:””,”vectorString”:””,”baseScore”:0,”baseSeverity”:””,”attackVector”:””,”attackComplexity”:””,”privilegesRequired”:””,”userInteraction”:””,”scope”:””,”confidentialityImpact”:””,”integrityImpact”:””,”availabilityImpact”:””,”cvssV3″:{“version”:””,”vectorString”:””,”baseScore”:0,”baseSeverity”:””,”attackVector”:””,”attackComplexity”:””,”privilegesRequired”:””,”userInteraction”:””,”scope”:””,”confidentialityImpact”:””,”integrityImpact”:””,”availabilityImpact”:””}},”href”:”https:\/\/www.malwarebytes.com\/blog\/news\/2026\/02\/grok-continues-producing-sexualized-images-after-promised-fixes”,”category_name”:”News”,”post_link”:””,”product”:””,”version”:””,”vendor”:””,”ai_description”:””,”ai_severity”:””,”ai_vendor”:””,”ai_product”:””,”ai_version”:””,”ai_score”:0}<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
{“lastseen”:”2026-02-04T14:05:42″,”description”:”Journalists decided to test whether the Grok chatbot still generates non\u2011consensual sexualized images, even after xAI, Elon Musk\u2019s artificial intelligence company, and X, the social…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[6,8,12,115,13,33,7,11,5],"class_list":["post-39006","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-category_news","tag-cve","tag-cvss","tag-exploit","tag-malwarebytes","tag-news","tag-none","tag-security","tag-tapic","tag-vulnerability"],"yoast_head":"\n