{“lastseen”:”2026-04-09T12:05:09″,”description”:”ProPublica has a scoop:\\n\\n\\u003e In late 2024, the federal government’s cybersecurity evaluators rendered a troubling verdict on one of Microsoft’s biggest cloud computing offerings.\\n\\u003e \\n\\u003e The tech giant’s \\”lack of proper detailed security documentation\\” left reviewers with a \\”lack of confidence in assessing the system’s overall security posture,\\” according to an internal government report reviewed by ProPublica.\\n\\u003e \\n\\u003e Or, as one member of the team put it: \\”The package is a pile of shit.\\”\\n\\u003e \\n\\u003e For years, reviewers said, Microsoft had tried and failed to fully explain how it protects sensitive information in the cloud as it hops from server to server across the digital terrain. Given that and other unknowns, government experts couldn’t vouch for the technology’s security.\\n\\u003e \\n\\u003e [\u2026]\\n\\u003e \\n\\u003e The federal government could be further exposed if it couldn’t verify the cybersecurity of Microsoft’s Government Community Cloud High, a suite of cloud-based services intended to safeguard some of the nation’s most sensitive information.\\n\\u003e \\n\\u003e Yet, in a highly unusual move that still reverberates across Washington, the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program, or FedRAMP, authorized the product anyway, bestowing what amounts to the federal government’s cybersecurity seal of approval. FedRAMP’s ruling–which included a kind of \\”buyer beware\\” notice to any federal agency considering GCC High–helped Microsoft expand a government business empire worth billions of dollars.”,”published”:”2026-04-09T10:51:36″,”modified”:”2026-04-09T10:51:51″,”type”:”schneier”,”title”:”On Microsoft\u2019s Lousy Cloud Security”,”source”:””,”references”:””,”id”:”SCHNEIER:5C59AFD2AC0DFEDE6D8CD299ECAE3A38″,”bulletinFamily”:”blog”,”cwe”:null,”cvelist”:[],”sourceData”:””,”sourceHref”:””,”cvss”:{“score”:0,”severity”:”NONE”,”vector”:”NONE”,”version”:”NONE”},”cvss2″:{},”cvss3″:{“version”:””,”vectorString”:””,”baseScore”:0,”baseSeverity”:””,”attackVector”:””,”attackComplexity”:””,”privilegesRequired”:””,”userInteraction”:””,”scope”:””,”confidentialityImpact”:””,”integrityImpact”:””,”availabilityImpact”:””,”cvssV3″:{“version”:””,”vectorString”:””,”baseScore”:0,”baseSeverity”:””,”attackVector”:””,”attackComplexity”:””,”privilegesRequired”:””,”userInteraction”:””,”scope”:””,”confidentialityImpact”:””,”integrityImpact”:””,”availabilityImpact”:””}},”href”:”https:\/\/www.schneier.com\/blog\/archives\/2026\/04\/on-microsofts-lousy-cloud-security.html”,”category_name”:”News”,”post_link”:””,”product”:””,”version”:””,”vendor”:””,”ai_description”:””,”ai_severity”:””,”ai_vendor”:””,”ai_product”:””,”ai_version”:””,”ai_score”:0}<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
{“lastseen”:”2026-04-09T12:05:09″,”description”:”ProPublica has a scoop:\\n\\n\\u003e In late 2024, the federal government’s cybersecurity evaluators rendered a troubling verdict on one of Microsoft’s biggest cloud computing offerings.\\n\\u003e \\n\\u003e…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[6,8,12,13,33,114,7,11,5],"class_list":["post-42784","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-category_news","tag-cve","tag-cvss","tag-exploit","tag-news","tag-none","tag-schneier","tag-security","tag-tapic","tag-vulnerability"],"yoast_head":"\n