CVE 8.4 HIGH

CVE-2025-62577_CVE-2025-62577

8.4 / 10
HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Description

ETERNUS SF provided by Fsas Technologies Inc. contains an incorrect default permissions vulnerability. A low-privileged user with access to the management server may obtain database credentials, potentially allowing execution of OS commands with administrator privileges.

Basic Information

ID CVE-2025-62577
Source jpcert
Published Oct 20, 2025 at 05:32

Affected Product

Vendor Fsas Technologies Inc.
Product ETERNUS SF AdvancedCopy Manager Standard Edition (for Solaris 10/ 11)
Version 15.0/ 15.1/ 15.2/ 15.3/ 16.0/ 16.1/ 16.2/ 16.3/ 16.4/ 16.5/ 16.6/ 16.7/ 16.8/ 16.9/ 16.9.1
Affected Versions Fsas Technologies Inc. ETERNUS SF AdvancedCopy Manager Standard Edition (for Solaris 10/ 11) 15.0/ 15.1/ 15.2/ 15.3/ 16.0/ 16.1/ 16.2/ 16.3/ 16.4/ 16.5/ 16.6/ 16.7/ 16.8/ 16.9/ 16.9.1
Fsas Technologies Inc. ETERNUS SF Storage Cruiser (for Solaris 10/ 11) 15.0/ 15.1/ 15.2/ 15.3/ 16.0/ 16.1/ 16.2/ 16.3/ 16.4/ 16.5/ 16.6/ 16.7/ 16.8/ 16.9/ 16.9.1
Fsas Technologies Inc. ETERNUS SF AdvancedCopy Manager Standard Edition (for RHEL 7/ 8/ 9) 16.2/ 16.3/ 16.4/ 16.5/ 16.6/ 16.7/ 16.8/ 16.9/ 16.9.1
Fsas Technologies Inc. ETERNUS SF Expressn (for RHEL 7/ 8/ 9) 16.2/ 16.3/ 16.4/ 16.5/ 16.6/ 16.7/ 16.8/ 16.9/ 16.9.1
Fsas Technologies Inc. ETERNUS SF Storage Cruisern (for RHEL 7/ 8/ 9) 16.2/ 16.3/ 16.4/ 16.5/ 16.6/ 16.7/ 16.8/ 16.9/ 16.9.1
Fsas Technologies Inc. ETERNUS SF AdvancedCopy Manager Standard Edition (for Windows Server 2016/ 2019/ 2022) 16.4/ 16.5/ 16.6/ 16.7/ 16.8/ 16.9/ 16.9.1
Fsas Technologies Inc. ETERNUS SF Express (for Windows Server 2016/ 2019/ 2022) 16.4/ 16.5/ 16.6/ 16.7/ 16.8/ 16.9/ 16.9.1
Fsas Technologies Inc. ETERNUS SF Storage Cruiser (for Windows Server 2016/ 2019/ 2022) 16.4/ 16.5/ 16.6/ 16.7/ 16.8/ 16.9/ 16.9.1

CWE Classification

References

💭 Join the Security Discussion

🔒 Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

⚠️ Please be respectful and constructive in your comments. Security discussions should remain professional.