Security Bulletin: Vulnerability in urllib3 affects IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 1.0(CPDS 1.0)[CVE-2023-43804].

Vulnerability Details

Basic Information

Title Security Bulletin: Vulnerability in urllib3 affects IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 1.0(CPDS 1.0)[CVE-2023-43804].
Type ibm
Published 2025-05-03T07:56:51
Last Seen 2025-05-03T10:56:45
CVSS Score 8.1 (HIGH)

CVSS v3 Details

Attack Vector NETWORK
Attack Complexity LOW
Privileges Required LOW
User Interaction NONE
Scope UNCHANGED
Confidentiality Impact HIGH
Integrity Impact HIGH
Availability Impact NONE

CVE Information

CVE IDs CVE-2023-43804
CWE
Bulletin Family software

Description

## Summary

The urllib3 package is used by IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 1.0. IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 1.0 has addressed the applicable CVE [CVE-2023-43804].

## Vulnerability Details

**CVEID:**CVE-2023-43804
**DESCRIPTION:** urllib3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by a flaw with cookie request header not stripped during cross-origin redirects. By sending a specially crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information, and use this information to launch further attacks against the affected system.
CVSS Base score: 5.9
CVSS Temporal Score: See: https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/268192 for the current score.
CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N)

## Affected Products and Versions

Affected Product(s)| Version(s)
—|—
IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 1.0 | 1.0.0.0- 1.0.8.4

## Remediation/Fixes

**IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading to latest version.**

**Product**| **VRMF**| **Remediation/First Fix**
—|—|—
IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 1.0| 1.0.9.0| Link to Fix Central

## Workarounds and Mitigations

None

##

Impact Assessment

Base Score 8.1
Severity HIGH

💭 Join the Security Discussion

🔒 Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

⚠️ Please be respectful and constructive in your comments. Security discussions should remain professional.