CVE 8.6 HIGH

Inngest TypeScript SDK exposes environment variables via serve() handler on unhandled HTTP methods_CVE-2026-42047

8.6 / 10
HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Description

Inngest is a platform for running event-driven and scheduled background functions with queueing, retries, and step orchestration. Versions 3.22.0 through 3.53.1 contain a vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to exfiltrate environment variables from the host process via the serve() HTTP handler. The serve() handler implements GET, POST, and PUT methods. Requests using PATCH, OPTIONS, or DELETE fall through to a generic handler that returns diagnostic information. A change introduced in v3.22.0 caused this diagnostic response to include the contents of process.env, exposing any secrets, API keys, or credentials present in the environment. An application is vulnerable if its serve() endpoint is reachable via PATCH, OPTIONS, or DELETE requests, which is common in setups like Next.js Pages Router or Express's app.use(...). Not affected are Next.js App Router handlers that export only GET, POST, and PUT, and applications using the connect worker method. This issue has been fixed in version 3.54.0. To work around this issue if upgrading is not immediately possible, restrict the serve() endpoint at the framework or reverse-proxy layer to accept only GET, POST, and PUT. The Inngest serve() endpoint does not require any other HTTP methods.

AI Analysis

Unauthenticated remote attackers can exfiltrate environment variables from the host process via the serve() HTTP handler due to a vulnerability in Inngest versions 3.22.0 through 3.53.1.

Basic Information

ID CVE-2026-42047
Source GitHub_M
Published May 7, 2026 at 20:38

Affected Product

Vendor inngest
Product inngest-js
Version >= 3.22.0, < 3.54.0
Affected Versions inngest inngest-js >= 3.22.0, < 3.54.0

CWE Classification

AI Assessment

AI Score 8.6 / 10
AI Severity High
Vendor Inngest
Product inngest-js
Version 3.22.0-3.53.1

References

💭 Join the Security Discussion

🔒 Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

⚠️ Please be respectful and constructive in your comments. Security discussions should remain professional.