Security Bulletin: Vulnerability in urllib3 affects IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 1.0(CPDS 1.0)[CVE-2023-43804, CVE-2023-45803].

Vulnerability Details

Basic Information

Title Security Bulletin: Vulnerability in urllib3 affects IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 1.0(CPDS 1.0)[CVE-2023-43804, CVE-2023-45803].
Type ibm
Published 2025-05-03T12:32:04
Last Seen 2025-05-03T19:56:26
CVSS Score 8.1 (HIGH)

CVSS v3 Details

Attack Vector NETWORK
Attack Complexity LOW
Privileges Required LOW
User Interaction NONE
Scope UNCHANGED
Confidentiality Impact HIGH
Integrity Impact HIGH
Availability Impact NONE

CVE Information

CVE IDs CVE-2023-43804, CVE-2023-45803
CWE
Bulletin Family software

Description

## Summary

The urllib3 package is used by IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 1.0. IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 1.0 has addressed the applicable CVE [CVE-2023-43804, CVE-2023-45803].

## Vulnerability Details

**CVEID:**CVE-2023-43804
**DESCRIPTION:** urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. urllib3 doesn’t treat the `Cookie` HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a `Cookie` header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn’t disable redirects explicitly. This issue has been patched in urllib3 version 1.26.17 or 2.0.5.
**CWE:**CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
**CVSS Source:** IBM X-Force
**CVSS Base score:** 5.9
**CVSS Vector:**(CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N)

**CVEID:**CVE-2023-45803
**DESCRIPTION:** urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. urllib3 previously wouldn’t remove the HTTP request body when an HTTP redirect response using status 301, 302, or 303 after the request had its method changed from one that could accept a request body (like `POST`) to `GET` as is required by HTTP RFCs. Although this behavior is not specified in the section for redirects, it can be inferred by piecing together information from different sections and we have observed the behavior in other major HTTP client implementations like curl and web browsers. Because the vulnerability requires a previously trusted service to become compromised in order to have an impact on confidentiality we believe the exploitability of this vulnerability is low. Additionally, many users aren’t putting sensitive data in HTTP request bodies, if this is the case then this vulnerability isn’t exploitable. Both of the following conditions must be true to be affected by this vulnerability: 1. Using urllib3 and submitting sensitive information in the HTTP request body (such as form data or JSON) and 2. The origin service is compromised and starts redirecting using 301, 302, or 303 to a malicious peer or the redirected-to service becomes compromised. This issue has been addressed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7 and users are advised to update to resolve this issue. Users unable to update should disable redirects for services that aren’t expecting to respond with redirects with `redirects=False` and disable automatic redirects with `redirects=False` and handle 301, 302, and 303 redirects manually by stripping the HTTP request body.
**CWE:**CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
**CVSS Source:** CVE.org
**CVSS Base score:** 4.2
**CVSS Vector:**(CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N)

## Affected Products and Versions

Affected Product(s)| Version(s)
—|—
IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 1.0| 1.0.0.0- 1.0.8.4

## Remediation/Fixes

**IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading to latest version.**

**Product**| **VRMF**| **Remediation/First Fix**
—|—|—
IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 1.0| 1.0.9.0| Link to Fix Central

## Workarounds and Mitigations

None

##

Impact Assessment

Base Score 8.1
Severity HIGH

💭 Join the Security Discussion

🔒 Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

⚠️ Please be respectful and constructive in your comments. Security discussions should remain professional.